Sullivan Jr. Anger From North's Lawyer. To make reference to the Nuremberg trials, I find personally and professionaly distasteful, and I can no longer sit here and listen to this. Inouye cracked down the gavel, and after several more hot exhanges resumed his statement.
He told Colonel North that he did not agree that ''in the defense of democracy'' the United States should ''embrace one of the most important tenets of Communism and Marxism - that the ends justify the means. Inouye said with a touch of bitterness in his voice. I did so not as an agent of the K. I did so because I was firmly convinced that to follow the course laid down by the Reagan proposal would certainly and inevitably lead to a point where young men and women of the United States would have to be sent into the conflict.
For both Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Inouye, their statements represented an unusual moment in the limelight. They are consummate Capitol Hill insiders, little known to the general public but widely respected by their colleagues for their skill as legislative craftsmen and for their low-key, self-effacing styles. Inouye Cites 'Sting of Bullet'. Hamilton, 56, is a lawyer who has specialized in foreign affairs. He was first elected to the House in Inouye, 62, is a lawyer with special interests in defense and intelligence matters.
He served in the House from to before moving to the Senate. Senator Inouye's own military background gave a special poignancy to his confrontation with Colonel North. He told the marine officer, ''As one who has felt the burning sting of bullet and shrapnel, and heard the unforgettable and frightening sound of incoming shells, I salute you, sir, as a fellow combat man. In , as a member of the legendary d Regimental Combat Team, made up of Japanese-Americans, he lost his right arm while single-handedly attacking a German machine-gun nest in the Po Valley in Italy.
He won a chestful of decorations to rival Colonel North's, including the Distinguished Service Cross, the second-highest award for valor. Many effective activists are instinctively empathetic and emotionally literate one academic analysis of the Jubilee debt campaign was p.
- Choose your subscription!
- Friday Street.
- Consider the Lily:A Case for Stress-Free Religion: A Case for Stress-Free Religion!
But many are not. I have seen too many examples of the finger wagging of angry lobbyists who seem unaware of what is going on in the heads of the people they are talking to and unable to grasp that their hectoring tone alienates the very people they are trying to influence. There is much greater scope for development organisations to pursue strategies that encourage mutual understanding, empathy, and trust.
The aid landscape is littered with terms that avoid the uncomfortable truth that seldom is power distributed fairly. The landmark Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness agreed by government aid donors and recipients in uses the words partner and partnership ninety-six times, but power not once. Even though aid donors increasingly accept the futility of pursuing purely technical solutions that ignore political realities, they are still not willing to talk about power. I wonder if the reluctance to address power explicitly in the aid world comes from viewing power as a zero sum game.
In some circumstances giving power to some people does mean taking it away from others. Often the role of activists is precisely to support that process, for example, by supporting coalitions that can redistribute power from the haves to the have-nots. Resistance from the haves is one reason why change can be violent and difficult on issues such as who owns land, or how the state levies tax and allocates spending. Good change strategies pursue something more subtle than outright confrontation which often plays into the hands of the powerful.
Reframing the understanding of self-interest, using divide and rule tactics to split up opposition blocs, or promoting long-term shifts in ideas and norms can help get round the zero sum problem.source url
Facebook promises not to stop politicians’ lies & hate
Moreover, many changes benefit both the have-nots and the haves. To add to the complexity, processes and institutions that initially favour one group are sometimes subverted over time and taken over by another: access to justice by poor communities can turn the law from a bulwark of the status quo to a driver of change; capture of democratic processes by the rich can achieve the exact opposite.
Empowerment is not so much a single event as a process taking place in a complex system replete with multiple feedback loops, rather than linear chains of cause and effect. Many aid organizations have come to the realization that their cherished projects on the ground are at best producing islands of success in a sea of failure as a result of bad government policies. In essence, a power analysis tells us who holds what power related to the matter, and what might influence them to change. Activists informed by a power analysis can select a more appropriate strategy: Will it be lobbying in the corridors of power, protesting in the street, or providing low profile, long-term support for grassroots organizations or public education?
Still more questions will sharpen the strategy: Who does the minister or CEO actually listen to? Is he or she persuaded by a successful demonstration on the ground, research, stories, media coverage, or the opinion of peers?
Power analysis can help activists identify a wider range of potential allies. Finally, power analysis can help us consider upcoming events that may open the door to change: Is an election in the offing? What influence would a drought or p. What happens when the Old Man dies? To move from a general exploration of power to specific plans for influencing its redistribution on any given issue, we need to identify the key players and map where they stand on the matter at hand: Who are the main actors involved poor communities, decision makers, private sector companies?
What other individuals or institutions media, religious institutions, intellectuals, traditional leaders are relevant and influential? Which are potential allies? Which are blockers? A key player, of course, is the activists themselves, and power analysis must include them. Discussion of where they are most likely to exert influence at the household, local, national, or global level should help identify promising entry points, tactics, and alliances.
Every activist group has strengths and weakness. For example, an international NGO like Oxfam can link up consumers in rich countries to put pressure on companies to improve their impact in poor ones, but it can also be seen as a tool of Western foreign policy.
Closer scrutiny normally uncovers a much more complex ecosystem, as I discovered in when I asked a group of Tajik activists and aid workers to list the stakeholders on water and sanitation in a typical village. All were seen as potential allies in improving the lamentable provision of water and sanitation. What combination of likely and unlikely allies will maximize the chances of success?
A traditional partnership between activist organizations, relationships with sympathetic individuals in government ministries, or a joint approach with private-sector companies? What is most likely to influence the target individuals and institutions whose support is needed to bring about change?
U.S. Intelligence Agencies Must Adapt to Cyberspace or Fail
Does the barrier to change lie in laws and policies, or in social norms, attitudes, and beliefs? Or is the issue rooted in conflicting interests and thus requires political mobilization to demonstrate clout? Is change most likely to occur around a specific event, e. I use cartoons a lot on my blog, and one of my favourites shows two medieval peasants walking past a castle wall, on which a severed head sits on a spike.
Open and individual opposition p. They have a feel for what works, built up from long experience and natural aptitude. A combination of these often underlies the resistance to change, even when evidence makes a compelling case. Sometimes the obstacle to change lies in the institutions through which decisions are made or implemented.
Bees, lies and evidence-based policy
Even when no-one in particular benefits materially from defending the status quo, management systems and corporate culture can be powerful obstacles to change. Although I love Oxfam dearly, I also wrestle with its institutional blockages, including multi-layered processes of sign-off and a tendency to make decisions in ever-expanding loops of emails p. I guess I need to work on my internal power analysis.
Often inertia is rooted in the conceptions and prejudices held by decision makers, even when their own material interest is not at risk. The elites interviewed—which included civil society, religious leaders, and academics as well as politicians, bureaucrats, and private sector leaders—all believed that redistributive policies make the poor lazy or lazier.
The overwhelming evidence for the effectiveness of cash transfers made no difference; neither did the fact that the elites stand to lose little from such reforms and could even gain electorally, in the case of politicians.
Former Manus Island detainee tells UN 'human beings are being destroyed'
We received a visit from a senior official at the Treasury, worried that we were going off message. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back. In the end, I fear that really deep-rooted ideas only change with generational turnover. Especially when a small number of players stand to lose a lot, whereas a large number of players stand to gain a little, the blockers are likely to be much better organized than the proponents.
Billions of people could benefit from a reduction in carbon emissions that reduces the threat of climate change, but they will have to overcome opposition from a handful of fossil fuel companies first. Please consider all of this when ordering, these orders can take longer to get to you than you may think. For international DHL orders please allow up to 5 weeks. Most DHL orders are routed first through Germany and may take longer to process. Please note that DHL packages are often handled by local postal carriers at final destination.